Shawdesh Desk:

The High Court today expressed dissatisfaction over the probe report submitted by the high-level investigation committee on the death of Union land office employee Sultana Jasmine in RAB custody in Naogaon.

‘The report is unclear,’ the High Court said. ‘It did not include anything regarding the process of detaining Sultana Jasmine. The report also failed to say whether her relatives were informed after her (Jasmine) detention. Therefore, the court is not satisfied with the report.’

The HC bench of Justice Farah Mahbub and Justice Muhammad Mahbub-ul-Islam made the remarks on Sunday.

Later, the High Court bench directed the preparation of the rule for the upcoming hearing on this matter. The court scheduled the hearing for the rule for November 29.

Advocate Manoj Kumar Bhowmick appeared for the writ petitioner in the court. Deputy attorney general Samarendra Nath Biswas, assistant attorney general Abul Kalam Khan Dawood and assistant attorney general Taufiq Sajwar Partha were present on behalf of the state.

Advocate Manoj Kumar Bhowmick said that the High Court was dissatisfied over the probe report as some key information was missing from the report.

Earlier on May 22, the Cabinet Division formed a high-level investigation committee to investigate the death of land office employee Sultana Jasmine in RAB custody in Naogaon based on the High Court’s directive.

The High Court ordered the committee to complete the investigation and submit its report within 60 days.

On August 14, the committee submitted a 302-page report to the High Court.

Union land office employee Sultana was detained by RAB from Muktirmor area of Naogaon city on March 22. She was admitted to Naogaon hospital the same day after she fell ill and later died at Rajshahi Medical College Hospital on March 24.

According to the postmortem report submitted by the forensic department of Rajshahi Medical College Hospital, Sultana Jasmine died from brain haemorrhage.

Rapid Action Battalion said that Jasmine was arrested for interrogation as there was an accusation of fraudulence against her.